Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Generalized MFTA/GDTA/CTA/CWA method as a tool for the development of an aviation intelligent adaptive system
Abstract
An example of conducting a generalized analysis using the MFTA/GDTA/CTA/CWA method is presented to implement the analytical stage of developing an intelligent adaptive system (IAS) that supports crew members in making decisions to avoid thunderstorms. The purpose of the IAS, the tasks and subtasks to achieve this goal, and the situational awareness requirements are defined. Based on the obtained information, the basic principles of adaptation implemented in the developed IAS are justified, aimed at minimizing potential negative aspects of its operation.
About the Authors
G. V. Kovalenko
St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation named after Chief Marshal of Aviation A.A. Novikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gennady V. Kovalenko, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Flight Operation and Safety in Civil Aviation
I. A. Yadrov
St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation named after Chief Marshal of Aviation A.A. Novikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Yadrov, Postgraduate Student
References
1. Сладкова Л. А. Анализ статистики авиакатастроф // Научные достижения и открытия 2019: сборник статей VIII Международного научно-исследовательского конкурса. Пенза: МЦНС «Наука и Просвещение», 2019. 146 с.
2. Коваленко Г. В., Ядров И. А. Перспективы применения интеллектуальных адаптивных систем поддержки принятия решений экипажами гражданских воздушных судов // Научный вестник ГосНИИ ГА. 2023. № 43. С. 28–38.
3. Коваленко Г. В., Ядров И. А. Сравнительный анализ методов разработки авиационных адаптивных систем и обобщенный метод MFTA/GDTA/CTA/CWA // Crede Experto: транспорт, общество, образование, язык. 2023.№ 3 (38). С. 18–40.
4. Brace W., Cheutet V. A framework to support requirements analysis in engineering design // Journal of Engineering Design. 2012.Vol. 23.№ 12. Pp. 876–904.
5. Stanton N. A. Distributed situation awareness // Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2016.Vol. 17.№ 1. Pp. 1–7.
6. Clark R. E., Feldon D. F., Van Merriënboer J. J. G. Cognitive task analysis // Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Routledge, 2008. Pp. 577–593.
7. Naikar N. Beyond interface design: Further applications of cognitive work analysis // International journal of industrial ergonomics.2006.Vol.36.№ 5.Pp.423–438.
8. Tourki Y., Keisler J., Linkov I. Scenario analysis: a review of methods and applications for engineering and environmental systems // Environment Systems & Decisions. 2013. Vol. 33. Pp. 3–20.
9. Bolstad C. A., Riley J. M. Using goal directed task analysis with Army brigade officer teams // Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2002. Vol. 46. № 3. Pp. 472–476.
10. Salas E., Maurino D., Curtis M. Human factors in aviation: an overview // Human factors in aviation. 2010. Pp. 3–19.
11. Sheridan T. B. Adaptive automation, level of automation, allocation authority, supervisory control, and adaptive control: Distinctions and modes of adaptation // IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans. 2011. Vol. 41. № 4. Pp. 662–667.
12. Rodrigues C. C. Aviation safety: Commercial airlines // International Encyclopedia of Transportation. 2021. Pp. 90–97
Review
For citations:
Kovalenko G.V., Yadrov I.A. Generalized MFTA/GDTA/CTA/CWA method as a tool for the development of an aviation intelligent adaptive system. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2024;(5):25-30. (In Russ.)
Views:
31
Email this article 