Preview

Transport of the Russian Federation

Advanced search

Competitiveness of transport universities: prospects of entering international ratings

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of methodology of international university ratings. A definition, an evaluation of connection between the position of Russian universities in the ratings and such key indicators as the share of the organisation’s income from all sources per one student and average number of students per one educational and research employee, and modelling of positions of transport universities in international institutional ratings (in case entrance criteria are met) are provided. For data analysis, functions in the shape of a linear additive model and a non-linear multiplicative model were formulated. The results obtained allow for the conclusion that a high degree of interdependence exists between the aforementioned variables: the position in the rating is the higher the higher is the income per one student and the lower the student to educational and research employee ratio. Results of application of expert evaluations also make significant influence on the force of correlational relationship and the final place of a university in international ratings. With the current income base and the student to educational and research employee ratio have low chances of entering the lists of the world’s top 500 best educational organisations.

About the Authors

A. Iu. Panychev
Emperor Alexander I St Petersburg State Transport University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr Iu. Panychev, Cand. Sc. Econ., senior lecturer, rector



V. A. Cherniaeva
Emperor Alexander I St Petersburg State Transport University
Russian Federation

Viktoriia A. Cherniaeva, Cand. Sc. Eng., senior lecturer, head of the Quality, Licensing and Accreditation Directorate



References

1. Методика академического рейтинга университетов мира ARWU 2020 года. Перевод ФГАНУ «Социоцентр».

2. Методология институционального рейтинга Times Higher Education 2020/2021 года. Перевод ФГАНУ «Социоцентр».

3. Методология предметного рейтинга QS World University Rankings 2021 года. Перевод ФГАНУ «Социоцентр».

4. Косьмин, А. Д. Гармонизация телеологических механизмов рынка и государства как условие социально-экономического прогресса / А. Д. Косьмин, Е. А. Косьмина. — Москва, 2017.

5. Донецкая, С. С. Реформирование высшего образования в Китае: современные итоги / С. С. Долецкая, Цзяньнань Цзи // Высшее образование в России. — 2018. — № 12.

6. Ендовицкий, Д. А. Конкурентоспособность российских университетов в глобальной системе высшего образования: количественный анализ / Д. А. Ендовицкий, В. В. Коротких, М. В. Воронова // Высшее образование в России. — 2020. — № 2.

7. Ehrenberg R. G. Econometric studies of higher education // Journal of Econometrics. — 2004. — Vol. 121. — № 1–2.

8. Sowter B., Reggio D., Hijazi S. QS World University Rankings // Research Analytics: Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics. — 2017.

9. Якорева, А. Проплаченные статьи и псевдоконференции: как вузы пытаются повысить свои рейтинги. — URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2019/09/09/810746-proplachennie-stati-i-psevdokonferentsii-kak-vuzi-pitayutsya-povisit-svoi-reitingi (дата обращения: 5.07.2021 г.).

10. Черепанова, Ю. Незачет по заданию // Forbes. — 2021. — № 7 (208).

11. URL: https://monitoring.miccedu.ru (дата обращения: 5.07.2021 г.).


Review

For citations:


Panychev A.I., Cherniaeva V.A. Competitiveness of transport universities: prospects of entering international ratings. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2021;(3):9-15. (In Russ.)

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-831Х (Print)
ISSN 2658-3674 (Online)