Methodological Justification for Separating Vehicular and Pedestrian Flows at Signalized Intersections
Abstract
The study examines determining signal-cycle parameters at intersections with pedestrian traffic. Pedestrian accident data from 2023–2024 in Vyborgsky District (St. Petersburg) are analyzed in relation to traffic intensity. Recommendations are provided for applying a methodology to decide whether to separate or maintain conflict between vehicular and pedestrian flows.
About the Authors
A. S. Kashtalinsky
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Kashtalinsky, Ph.D. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Higher School of Transport
E. O. Kulabukhova
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina O. Kulabukhova, M.Sc., same school
D. V. Lipatkin
Institute of Regional Economic Problems, RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Denis V. Lipatkin, Researcher, Laboratory for Mathematical Modeling of Functional and Spatial Urban Development
References
1. Zafri N. M., Tabassum T., Himal M. R. H. et al. Effect of pedestrian characteristics and their road crossing behaviors on driver yielding behavior at controlled intersections // Journal of Safety Research. 2022. Vol. 81. P. 1–8.
2. Zhang Y., Mamum S. A., Ivan J. N. et al. Safety effects of exclusive and concurrent signal phasing for pedestrian crossing // Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2015. Vol. 83. P. 26–36.
3. Ivan J. N., McKernan K., Zhang Y. et al. A study of pedestrian compliance with traffic signals for exclusive and concurrent phasing // Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2017. Vol. 98. P. 157–166.
4. Global status report on road safety 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization. URL: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/375016/9789240086517-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (дата обращения: 03.04.2025).
5. Баканов К. С., Гордеева А.Д.,Коблов П. С. и др. Зарубежный опыт противодействия основным факторам риска в дорожном движении: учебное пособие. М.: ФКУ «Научный центр БДД МВД России», 2024. 180 с.
6. Кременец Ю. А., Печерский М. П., Афанасьев М. Б. Технические средства организации дорожного движения. М.: ИКЦ «Академкнига», 2005. 279 с.
7. Шелков Ю. Д. Организация дорожного движения в городах. М.: Альянс, 2018. 142 с.
8. Михайлов А. Ю., Шестеров Е. А. Условия эффективного применения выделенных пешеходных фаз // Вестник гражданских инженеров. 2021. № 4 (87). С. 134–142.
9. Изменение № 1 к ГОСТ Р 52289–2019. URL: https://protect.gost.ru/v.aspx?control=8&baseC=6&page=2&month=1&year=2020&search=&RegNum=1&DocOnPageCount=15&id=253738 (дата обращения: 04.03.2025).
10. Сведения о показателях состояния безопасности дорожного движения. Электронная карта.URL: http://stat.gibdd.ru/ (дата обращения: 21.02.2025).
Review
For citations:
Kashtalinsky A.S., Kulabukhova E.O., Lipatkin D.V. Methodological Justification for Separating Vehicular and Pedestrian Flows at Signalized Intersections. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2025;(5):58-63. (In Russ.)
Views:
51
JATS XML
Email this article 